Thanks for responding. Here's what I can tell you: the photos are geotagged by the camera when the picture is taken (I'm pretty sure because the elevations can vary slightly from photo to photo). Once again, the Z associated with the image refers to the height of the camera when the picture is taken. ContextCapture recognizes that the photos are georeferenced automatically. I indicate under the "Additional Data" tab that the photos are "Vertical views only" (nadir). If I look at the "3D view" tab, ContextCapture has assigned WGS 84 (IPSG:4326) to the photo group and has read the Lat/Long & Z values photo-by-photo. I will add this right up front: if I put in Control Points, then ContextCapture will put the resulting model in the proper place, but this can be quite time-consuming. I'm trying to see if there is a quick-and-dirty way of doing what I'm trying to accomplish: push the model results up or down in the Z-direction. I now begin the Aerotriangulation process by clicking on the "Submit Aerotriangulation" button . When ContextCapture gets to the "Positioning/georeferencing screen", I've been using the option selected by ContextCapture of "Use photo positioning data for rigid registration", but I wonder if I should be using the "Use photo positioning data for adjustment" option instead--not sure what the differences between these two options are. I don't change anything on the "Settings" screen, and then I begin the Aerotriangulation process by hitting the "Submit" button. After Aerotriangulation is complete, I then move into the Production definition stage. After I initiate the process and "Reconstruction_1" is created, I go back and highlight "Reconstruction_1" and work my way through the five tabs of "General", "Spatial framework", "Reconstruction constraints", "Reference 3D model", and "Processing settings". For "Spatial framework", I change the "Spatial reference system" from "Local East-North-Up; origin: 28.787030N 81....." to "WGS 84" (there is an option for "WGS 84, orthometric height (EGM96)"--is this what I should be using?) I then decide whether I need to tile the Photo group depending on what the expected maximum RAM usage will be. I skip the "Reconstruction constraints" and "Reference 3D model" tabs and go to the "Processing settings" tab where I make the model less precise to decrease the processing time by changing Geometric precision to "Medium". Once I've changed/made these settings, I go back to "General" and click the "Submit new Production button". I name my production, advance to the next screen and keep the selection of "3D mesh", advance to the next screen and decrease the JPEG quality of the texture maps to 50% because the output doesn't need to be the best at this point, and advance to the Spatial reference system screen to select my output to be in a State Plane coordinate system as my target coordinate system. I accept the default output folder and hit the "Submit" button to begin the process. After the Production is completed, I'll load the resulting 3mx file into ConceptStation. I'm doing this entire process for all my various drone flights for the purpose of seeing how the various flights fit together. They all are loading into my ConceptStation file adjacent to one another (more-or-less, some knitting-together issues), but they all are way too low to where they should be according to ConceptStation. I know I need to alter the Z values somewhere along the line, but I'm not sure where. I see that there is an "Advanced Options" link to click at two different places in the process: the first is during Reconstruction>>Spatial Framework where if you click you have the option to change the origin of the first tile. There's also the "Advanced Options" link under Production Definition>>Spatial Reference System where you can change the origin for the 3D model origin as well. Maybe the latter one would work for me to alter where the model is referenced into ConceptStation? For this particular effort, my ContextCapture 3D models are loading in way below where ConceptStation says they should be loading. Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by "If you are trying to get orthometric elevations or geoidal heights then you would have to apply the appropriate separation for your area". Please elaborate. Thanks in advance for any help
↧