Hello, it's my first reconstruction from an aerotriangulation using the import positioning from IMU data for the photos position. Unfortunately i have no another aids to perform the aerotriangulation. When importing rotation data, CC asks for the camera position, 8 positions are allowable, combining the X axis position with de Y axis one, but i only know, because the photo size, then i have tried with two positions with X axis in horizontal position generating a visual to the earth (not to sky) XLEFT Y DOWN and XRIGHT Y UP. Both aero triangulations have a good quality report, including all photos in calibration with no isolated one, littel position uncertainties. In both cases the reconstruction settings are the same, spatial framework using regular planar grid (grid size 20 units) and Extra precision for geometric precision. In both cases the result doesn't show a very quality result. I'm sending both aerot quality report, the aerot 3d views and the 3d mesh result and one of 116 photos taken. In the 3d mesh result it can be appreciated the very low resolution, the results are very pixeled. I need some tips for solving and knowing if I am doing anything wrong. communities.bentley.com/.../6562.X-LEFT-Y-DOWN-_2D00_-AT-_2D00_-AT-_2D00_-QualityReport.pdf communities.bentley.com/.../3058.X-RIGHT-Y-UP-_2D00_-AT-_2D00_-AT-_2D00_-QualityReport.pdf
↧